<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Midlist, Schmidlist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robertswartwood.com/insights/midlist-smidlist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robertswartwood.com/insights/midlist-smidlist/</link>
	<description>Occasional News, Insights, Rants, and Other Miscellaneous Stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:36:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.robertswartwood.com/insights/midlist-smidlist/#comment-540</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 21:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertswartwood.com/?p=555#comment-540</guid>
		<description>Thanks for linking this, Rob.  I hadn&#039;t seen it before.  I enjoyed it the way that I enjoy reading The Onion while drinking a seven dollar bottle of vodka on a Friday night.   My favorite part might be where the author&#039;s loyal fans still come up to her and tell her how her book changed her life.  But really, you don&#039;t need to get much past the author&#039;s choice of pseudonyms to realize what you&#039;re in for.  &quot;Jane Austen Doe&quot;?  Really?  Why not just Joan of Arc?  Surely there are better names for martyrs.  

Face it: when you start an essay talking about how your first book deal got a $150,000 advance and you end with &quot;And I wait.  And I wait,&quot; you&#039;re pretty much holding yourself up to a hailstorm of japery and rotten tomatoes.  And deservedly so.  Writers&#039; careers are full of ups and downs (ask Doug Clegg), years of disappointment and dashed hopes, because the marketplace is so wildly unpredictable and writing for a living is such a counterintuitive, unadvisable act of financial planning...by our own admission.   Yes, it&#039;s erratic.  Yes, it&#039;s full of smashed ambition and demolished expectation.  Anybody who reads anything about the industry knows that.  But I don&#039;t buy completely buy this essay as a valuable reality check for aspiring writers (whoever they are), for a couple reasons.    First, because it sounds too much like I&#039;m on the receiving end of somebody&#039;s therapy session, and second of all, even if it were nothing more than a simple recitation of diminishing returns, it&#039;s one writer&#039;s experience, designed to do what?  Discourage other writers from trying a novel?  Provide fodder for boring, depressing cocktail parties?  Confirm our most paranoid fears about the Future of Literature?  

As you said, writers will keep on writing, and everybody else won&#039;t.   Some of us have even ghostwritten celebrity bios of our own.  Who knows, maybe Jane Austen Doe and I both worked on the Jesse Ventura autobiography...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for linking this, Rob.  I hadn&#8217;t seen it before.  I enjoyed it the way that I enjoy reading The Onion while drinking a seven dollar bottle of vodka on a Friday night.   My favorite part might be where the author&#8217;s loyal fans still come up to her and tell her how her book changed her life.  But really, you don&#8217;t need to get much past the author&#8217;s choice of pseudonyms to realize what you&#8217;re in for.  &#8220;Jane Austen Doe&#8221;?  Really?  Why not just Joan of Arc?  Surely there are better names for martyrs.  </p>
<p>Face it: when you start an essay talking about how your first book deal got a $150,000 advance and you end with &#8220;And I wait.  And I wait,&#8221; you&#8217;re pretty much holding yourself up to a hailstorm of japery and rotten tomatoes.  And deservedly so.  Writers&#8217; careers are full of ups and downs (ask Doug Clegg), years of disappointment and dashed hopes, because the marketplace is so wildly unpredictable and writing for a living is such a counterintuitive, unadvisable act of financial planning&#8230;by our own admission.   Yes, it&#8217;s erratic.  Yes, it&#8217;s full of smashed ambition and demolished expectation.  Anybody who reads anything about the industry knows that.  But I don&#8217;t buy completely buy this essay as a valuable reality check for aspiring writers (whoever they are), for a couple reasons.    First, because it sounds too much like I&#8217;m on the receiving end of somebody&#8217;s therapy session, and second of all, even if it were nothing more than a simple recitation of diminishing returns, it&#8217;s one writer&#8217;s experience, designed to do what?  Discourage other writers from trying a novel?  Provide fodder for boring, depressing cocktail parties?  Confirm our most paranoid fears about the Future of Literature?  </p>
<p>As you said, writers will keep on writing, and everybody else won&#8217;t.   Some of us have even ghostwritten celebrity bios of our own.  Who knows, maybe Jane Austen Doe and I both worked on the Jesse Ventura autobiography&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Swartwood</title>
		<link>http://www.robertswartwood.com/insights/midlist-smidlist/#comment-532</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Swartwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 20:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertswartwood.com/?p=555#comment-532</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s definitely a wake-up call for many writers who dream of being best-selling authors. And yeah, I think writers will keep on writing because that&#039;s what they do ... but getting paid well for it too is always nice. Or was always nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s definitely a wake-up call for many writers who dream of being best-selling authors. And yeah, I think writers will keep on writing because that&#8217;s what they do &#8230; but getting paid well for it too is always nice. Or was always nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy D Brooks</title>
		<link>http://www.robertswartwood.com/insights/midlist-smidlist/#comment-531</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy D Brooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 17:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertswartwood.com/?p=555#comment-531</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m kind of sorry I read that article last night (from @docbrite&#039;s tweet), and am doubly sorry that I RT&#039;d it. It&#039;s depressing--it&#039;s true and honest and is a reality-injecting cautionary tale, but there is little there of value for a writer who isn&#039;t on the fence about writing for a living. It&#039;s the writer&#039;s equivalent of &quot;I love cats but they keep dying every 15 years, woe is me&quot;.

I just ranted on this over at Aaron Polson&#039;s blog this morning, so I&#039;ll &lt;a href=&quot;http://aaronpolson.blogspot.com/2009/12/power-of-interweb.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;link&lt;/a&gt; instead of repeating. But the thesis is, essentially: regardless of what happens to the ivory towers in Manhattan, storytellers-as-capitalists have been working their craft since prehistory, and there isn&#039;t anything short of armageddon that is going to stop it now. We&#039;ll just have to learn to become better hunters instead of relying exclusively on trade for our bison haunches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m kind of sorry I read that article last night (from @docbrite&#8217;s tweet), and am doubly sorry that I RT&#8217;d it. It&#8217;s depressing&#8211;it&#8217;s true and honest and is a reality-injecting cautionary tale, but there is little there of value for a writer who isn&#8217;t on the fence about writing for a living. It&#8217;s the writer&#8217;s equivalent of &#8220;I love cats but they keep dying every 15 years, woe is me&#8221;.</p>
<p>I just ranted on this over at Aaron Polson&#8217;s blog this morning, so I&#8217;ll <a href="http://aaronpolson.blogspot.com/2009/12/power-of-interweb.html" rel="nofollow">link</a> instead of repeating. But the thesis is, essentially: regardless of what happens to the ivory towers in Manhattan, storytellers-as-capitalists have been working their craft since prehistory, and there isn&#8217;t anything short of armageddon that is going to stop it now. We&#8217;ll just have to learn to become better hunters instead of relying exclusively on trade for our bison haunches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Gramlich</title>
		<link>http://www.robertswartwood.com/insights/midlist-smidlist/#comment-530</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Gramlich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertswartwood.com/?p=555#comment-530</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s good to have even a few fans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good to have even a few fans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

