New Look, New Giveaway

I told you the paperback would be available soon, didn’t I? You can purchase a copy at Amazon, or, as is the case with all of my print books, email me if you’d like one signed. Also, via Goodreads, I’m giving away five copies until the end of the month. Go enter now!

Through Shattered Glass Is FREE!

One of my favorite horror short story writers, David B. Silva, is making his great collection Through Shattered Glass available for free on Kindle. Here’s what he has to say:

My short story collection, Through Shattered Glass, will be offered free for Kindle readers on Wednesday, March 14th through Thursday, March 15th.

The original collection was published in a limited edition of only 300 copies by Gauntlet Press, and I’m really eager to get it into the hands of more readers.

The collection takes readers on an imaginative journey through the lives of seventeen ordinary people struggling with extraordinary events in their lives.

This is a must-read collection for anyone who loves horror/dark fantasy stories, or really just short stories in general.

Oh, and did I mention it includes an introduction by the one and only Dean Koontz?

Well, it does.

GRAB IT WHILE IT’S FREE!

Tax Time

Going through my spreadsheets and receipts tonight in preparation for meeting with an accountant tomorrow, I realized that I purchased 68 books in 2011 (I’m not counting journal subscriptions, or books purchased at libraries).

I spent about $290 overall.

Only 10 of those books were print, and their combined cost was about $185.

The rest were e-books. For 58 of them, I only spent about $105.

Ain’t that something?

EDIT: Actually, I did buy several print books at last year’s AWP, maybe a dozen or more, and probably spent about $150 or so, but unfortunately I don’t have any receipts. Still, I think it’s fair to mention that as well.

When Tags Attack

There’s a mindset that when an author has a book published, that’s it. Sure, a little promotion here and there, but then that author moves on to the next book. And while this is nice in theory, the truth is an author — either traditionally published or self-published — should always be aware of all of his or her books.

I know many newer self-published authors struggle with trying not to check their sales every half hour, but really, it’s like watching paint dry sometimes. Some authors try to go weeks, even a full month, without checking their sales, and while that shows strong willpower, I think it’s important for self-published authors to check their sales and product pages at least once a day. The reason being that a lot can change in a day. Amazon might for some reason do a price match and drop the price of one of your books. It might go from $2.99 to 99 cents, and if you weren’t vigilant, a whole week or more might pass before it came to your attention. Your book could even be made free for some reason, like it did to one writer awhile back who then made a big stink, complaining that Amazon owed him money for every free download (which is stupid, really, because a free download is far from being a sale, as those who downloaded the book most likely would never have bought it in the first place). Also, I believe it’s important to track your sales. If a particular title is selling well, good. If it’s selling extremely well, great. If it’s not selling at all, you need to examine it and ask yourself why.

So far this month, because of my free promotion at the end of February, No Shelter has sold just over 650 copies in the US Kindle Store.

In the UK Kindle Store?

A big whopping zero.

So yesterday I investigated and saw that in the UK Amazon No Shelter had a new review — a two-star review from a reader who thought the book was just completely unbelievable. Okay, fair enough, because really, the book is completely unbelievable which is, you know, sort of the point. But as I’ve said before, you can’t really argue with reader reviews and just need to accept them for what they are.

But then I noticed something else that had to do with the book’s tags. Now, I’ve never really understood the point of tagging books, though I know for awhile a lot of writers bandied together to tag each other’s stuff until Amazon sort of put the lid on it. I never saw the point, really, because it didn’t seem that all of that tagging was doing much good for those writers. Anyway, when I looked at the tags, I found these:

So yeah, as you can see, some kind reader helpfully tagged No Shelter as “child sex abuse fiction” and “paedophile fiction,” among other things (what, exactly, is “goan crime fiction”?).

Of course, the problem arises that the book features neither of those two things.

So are those two tags keeping my book from selling? Hard to say. But what I can say is that I wasn’t (and am still not) happy to have my book associated with those two tags. If someone wanted to tag them “awful” and “sucks” that would be one thing, but those two? Absolutely not.

I contacted Amazon immediately, basically saying that it came to my attention those two tags had been used in regards to my book, which did not feature either of those things, and would it be possible to have them deleted.

Well, here was my response:

Hello Robert,

Thank you for contacting Amazon.co.uk with your concern. I’m sorry if you were offended by the contents of the tags for your book “No Shelter.”

We understand your concern, but the tags don’t fall outside of our guidelines. Therefore, we cannot remove the “child sex abuse fiction” and “paedophile fiction” tags from our site. I apologise if this causes you any frustration.

We want our feature to be something that all our customers find useful.

Please take a look at our tags Guidelines for information about acceptable tags content:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/help/customer/display.html?ie=UTF8&nodeId=200255630

We appreciate your understanding in this matter. Thank you for your interest in Amazon.co.uk.

I once again checked the information about acceptable tags content — which I had done before I sent my first message — and saw that yep, I still had a case … or at least I thought I did. After all, I’m not sure how all of their customers would find grossly misleading tags useful, but whatever. So I sent this message:

I’m following up on a response from [name redacted] in regards to one of my titles being tagged “child sex abuse fiction” and “paedophile fiction” — neither of which have anything to do with my book. [name redacted] says the tags don’t fall outside of your guidelines and hence cannot be removed, but isn’t one of your guidelines for tagging that customers should not use “Tags that promote illegal or immoral conduct”? If that’s the case, how does “child sex abuse fiction” and “paedophile fiction” not fall under this umbrella?

I haven’t received a reply yet, but even when and if I do, I don’t see much changing. Unlike many writers who complain about their dealings with Amazon, I’ve never had a problem as they’ve fixed whatever problem I had before without much fuss. This, however, is different. Amazon is, above and beyond, all about customer service. So if a customer placed those tags there, then so be it. At some point hopefully new readers come along and add new, more appropriate tags. Or readers who have read the book might be able to downgrade those two tags (I’m told this is a thing, apparently?). Either way, those tags are there and there isn’t anything I can do about it.

My point?

Well, as an author (either self-published or traditionally published), you need to be very vigilant about your work, no matter how long ago it was published. Because sometimes, well, sometimes shit happens.

UPDATE: I received the following reply from Amazon. As expected, the outcome is not in my favor despite the fact that the tags are in direct violation of Amazon’s own tagging guidelines:

Hello Robert,

I understand you are concerned by the tags posted on your book “No Shelter.”  After careful consideration, I agree with my colleague that the tags don’t fall outside of our guidelines. Therefore, we cannot remove the tags from our site. I apologise if this causes you any frustration.

I understand that you are upset and I regret that we have not been able to address your concerns to your satisfaction. Unfortunately, we will not be able to offer any additional insight or action on these matters.

We appreciate your understanding in this matter. Thank you for your interest in Amazon.co.uk.

String-of-10 FOUR Winners Announced

From Flash Fiction Chronicles:

CONGRATULATIONS go out to Troy Farah whose story, “When Elliot Let Go,” has been selected by Guest Judge Robert Swartwood as the FIRST PLACE WINNER of the String-of-10 Four Flash Fiction Contest. 

“When Elliot Let Go” will be published in April at Every Day Fiction.  ”Dutch Boy” by Len Kuntz and “Nothing Left to Lose” by Andrew Stancek have placed Second and Third respectively and will be published in April at Flash Fiction Chronicles.  Exact publications dates to be arranged.

You’ll find a complete list of Winners and Semi-Finalists (in alphabetical order) plus an interview with Robert Swartwood below.

 Top Three Winners:

First Place: When Elliot Let Go by Troy Farah
Second Place: Dutch Boy by Len Kuntz
Third Place: Nothing Left to Lose by Andrew Stancek

Honorable Mention:

Pompeii is for Lovers by Folly Blaine
Victims by Toni Somers
Occupy Upstate by Ralph Uttaro
Red Triangle Secrets by Sidney Bending

Semi-Finalists

A Bitter Wage by Jane Banning
Bearing Witness by Linda Wastila
Cure-all by Oonah V Joslin
Everything by Rachel Thompson
Gardening by Vanessa Gebbie
Immutability by Sue Ann Connaughton
In Dreams by J. Chris Lawrence
Last Respects by Jillian Schmidt
Marbles by Eliza Tomprou
Modern Women by Sally York
The Cost by JPReese

The Winner of the Patricia McFarland Memorial Prize

Most effective use of all ten prompt words and incorporation of the theme of freedom.

The Cost by JP Reese

Congratulations to all who entered the String-of-10 FOUR Flash Fiction Contest. 

As mentioned, you can find my interview at the bottom of this page.

Worst Tagline Ever?

It’s difficult to see, but the tagline is “In the farthest reaches of space, something has gone terribly wrong.”

Two other taglines I’ve seen for the movie include “Terror Times Infinity” and “All Hell is About to Break Loose.”

Who says Hollywood isn’t creative?

Clearly I Need My Own Show

Four days ago:

Today:

*shakes fist at Conan*

Spooky Nook, A Year Later

Last year around this time I decided to really dive into the digital world and start self-publishing a handful of novels that had been collecting virtual dust on my hard drive. It was a risk, as there was no guarantee any of the books would sell, but thankfully that risk seems to have paid off. The first novel I published was The Calling, which I released nearly a year ago this month, and I’ll talk more in-depth about that title in the next week or so. For now, I want to look at Spooky Nook, which I billed as a “prequel of sorts” to The Calling, a 10,000-word novelette about a writer whose wife has been missing for eight months encountering a familiar old woman with an odd request — a request that will introduce him to a surprising evil.

I forget if I mentioned this before, but the initial idea for the story came to me all the way back in high school. I was working at a local movie theater, and one night I was outside changing the marquee, and one of the movies coming in or going out was the Jodie Foster flick Anna and the King. And I, being the huge Stephen King fan that I was (and still am), gave it this very minor tweak: Anna and Stephen King.

Not that original, sure, but the idea stayed with me, and I began to wonder just who Anna was, and what Stephen King had to do with her. Of course, the story changed through multiple drafts, and then at some point I realized I could connect it with The Calling. Both the novel and the novelette can stand apart, but both make reference to events in the other work, which can be neat for those readers who like stories crisscrossing. My ultimate goal was that, when The Calling was eventually published, to have Spooky Nook appear in a magazine or online just before the novel’s release, to help promote the book. Obviously that didn’t happen, and so I decided to release the novelette as an ebook a month or two before I released The Calling. I included the prologue and first three chapters of The Calling as a teaser (including the great photo as the cover, provided by Greg Miller). I never expected Spooky Nook to be anything more than a promotional piece for the novel, and didn’t expect many sales.

Well, just over a year has passed, and between Kindle and Nook, Spooky Nook has sold just over 1,500 copies. Because I like numbers, here’s the monthly breakdown starting in February of 2011 and working its way to last month:

  • February: 6
  • March: 5
  • April: 10
  • May: 23
  • June: 30
  • July: 47
  • August: 72
  • September: 76
  • October: 115
  • November: 143
  • December: 209
  • January: 369
  • February: 397

As you can see, a nice progression there near the end of the year. Of course, ebooks sales were high across the board heading into Christmas and the month after, but even into February they have been strong. Now the question is, is Spooky Nook selling because it’s a “prequel of sorts” to The Calling? I think it is. After all, I excerpt Spooky Nook after The Calling, so readers who enjoyed the novel will most likely have no problem dropping 99 cents (or 77 pounds) on the ebook. So there’s that.

Anyway, if you haven’t had a chance to check out Spooky Nook yet, it can be purchased in the US Kindle store and the UK Kindle store, and in the NOOK store. Let’s see what kind of year this little novelette can have in 2012.

Make That Four

The results of the 5th Annual Micro Award have been announced, and the winner is … not me. That title goes to Bruce Holland Rogers for his story “Divestiture.” Runner-up this year is Aubrey Hirsch for her story “Certainty” which appeared in PANK … the same great magazine that also published my story “Seven Items In Jason Reynolds’ Jacket Pocket, Two Days After His Suicide, As Found By His Eight-Year-Old Brother, Grady,” which was the runner-up last year. So congrats to Bruce and Aubrey, and congrats to PANK!

What about the finalists? you ask. Well, there were a few finalists, one of them being my story “Fright X,” which now makes this four years in a row I’ve been recognized by the Micro Award. Am I bummed I didn’t win? Not at all. As they say, it’s just an honor to be nominated.

Anyway, if you haven’t already, you can check out “Fright X” here, as well as an interview I did about the award and flash fiction here.

Free Free Free Blah Blah Blah

The other day Kevin Lucia did a blog post about the constant bombardment of the OH MY GOD MY EBOOK IS FREE TODAY AT AMAZON ORDER IT AND TELL YOUR FRIENDS!!! you see constantly on Facebook and Twitter.

I don’t really have much to add to that other than yes, it is troublesome. For newbie writers to grow an audience, how do they find readers? The 99-cent price point is a waste, in my opinion, so obviously the next step is free. But then if readers know you’ve made your book free once, they might assume you’ll make your other books free, and won’t buy your stuff. So … what are you left with (besides, potentially, just being really annoying)?

Anyway, as I discussed recently, I enrolled some books into the Kindle Select Program to test it out. The deal, in case you aren’t aware, is making your ebook available exclusively to Amazon for 90 days, in which Amazon Prime members can then “borrow” that book (members can borrow only one ebook a month, and Amazon kicks in a kitty of over $500,000 to the participating writers and averages out that amount to all the borrows at the end of said month). One of the perks, however, is being able to make your ebook free for up to five days. This can have a tremendous impact on your book. In fact, last month it helped my thrillers No Shelter and Man of Wax sell a ton of copies, and brought me even more readers. So I consider it a success.

My point? Well, I had three free days left on No Shelter, two free days left on Man of Wax, so yesterday I made No Shelter free, and today I made Man of Wax free to close out the month. The exclusivity is up at the end of March, and I plan to enter them back into the other stores and see how they do there (my NOOK sales have begun to pick up, and I wonder what having more titles available will do).

Anyway, so I made both ebooks free, and didn’t realize until today that making both titles free at the same time might not be a good idea. After all, they had both sneaked into the Free Top 100 at different times, and on its first day No Shelter reached the Top 100, so maybe that would somehow keep Man of Wax out of the Top 100.

Nope. They’re both there in the Free Top 100, where they will hopefully stay into tomorrow night when the promotion ends.

And before anyone asks — no, I have no idea how they got so high up in the ranking. I really didn’t do much except mention they were free on Facebook and Twitter, and even then their rankings were pretty high. Maybe they reached the Top 100 because they had been in the Top 100 before, but again, I have no idea how it happened. As with everything, the answer is luck.

However, wherever there is luck, there is also unluck (which I’m saying is a word). For some reason, Amazon is acting up and messing with reviews. I noticed it late last night how some reviews would disappear … and then reappear a half hour later. I did some quick research and found this was indeed a bug in Amazon’s system that they were trying to figure out. Which is all fine and good, but reviews are crucial, especially when a title gets all the way up into the Top 100 where it’s most widely seen.

Case in point: before the free promotion today, Man of Wax had 19 reviews, 11 of which were five-star. Then, maybe a half hour ago, I checked the ranking and for some reason saw that Man of Wax now had only 5 reviews: 1 five-star, 1 four-star, and 3 one-star. Obviously I saw this as a problem in regards to finding potential readers. Then again, while the one-star reviews don’t help with the algorithm, they do alert potential readers to the fact that the book is indeed dark and disturbing. This is good, because not every reader likes dark and disturbing, so if a reader is turned off by the book based on that one-star review, then that’s probably for the best. At least they didn’t try reading it and hate it enough to then leave their own one-star review. On the flip side, a one-star review that complains the book is dark and disturbing can actually motivate some readers to download the book, so there’s that.

(And then there’s the reader who says they loved No Shelter so they tried Man of Wax and thought Man of Wax was awful so they left a one-star review … despite the fact they didn’t leave any review for No Shelter. Say whaaaaat?)

But now I just looked again and all the reviews seem to be restored for Man of Wax, including two additional reviews, bringing it to 21 overall. So there’s that. But no telling how long before some of those reviews disappear again.

So again, my point?

Well, that you have one more day to download No Shelter and Man of Wax while they’re free. Go grab ‘em!