2 Hint Dates & 2 Hint Blurbs

These were just confirmed today, so I haven't yet had a chance to contact the contributors who expressed interest in attending the events, but I'm pleased to announce that two locations have been secured for this November's release of the Hint Fiction anthology. These were my first choices, and I'm very happy that everything worked out. November 3rd Vroman's Bookstore in Pasadena, and November 10th McNally Jackson in New York City. Much fun will be had at both locations, so make sure to get your travel arrangements in order now.

Also, here are two more blurbs for the anthology:

“Some of these stories suggest entire novels in just few words. So, in this small book, you have a whole library. It’s reading at the speed of light.” — Robert Shapard, editor of Sudden Fiction and Flash Fiction

“The stories in Robert Swartwood’s Hint Fiction have some serious velocity.  Some explode, some needle, some bleed, and some give the reader room to dream. They’re fun and addictive, like puzzles or haiku or candy. I’ve finished mine but I want more.” — Stewart O’Nan, author of Last Night at the Lobster and Songs for the Missing

Karma Of Chameleon

The July issue of PANK is now live, featuring stories by Rachel Adams, Stace Budzko, Sara Crowley, Alana Dakin, Tim Dicks, Whitey Erickson, Jen Gann, Kyle Minor, Ansley Moon, Gena Mowish, Johnsie Noel, Tia Prouhet, Laura Read, Keith Rosson, Chris Sheehan, Robert Anthony Siegel, Robb Todd, Brandi Wells, Bill Yarrow, and yours truly.

My story is called "The Chameleon Kid" and it's pretty weird. Not only can you read it, but you can also listen to me reading it (both links take you to the same page). Or, if you'd prefer to be a jerk and do neither, enjoy the video below.

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XEhXcEpajN0

Plotting The Outline

Recently I've begun watching the television series 24. My local library had a couple of seasons on DVD, and I ended up going through marathon sessions (I just finished season five). Basically, when I get a new season, nothing else (reading or writing) gets done. I watch episode after episode. I can't understand how people could have watched the series during the regular season, having to wait an entire week before the next episode, one that would, inevitably, leave off with a cliffhanger.

Yes, the show can be frustrating. You can piece apart all the problems. But in the end it's great mindless fun. I could watch Jack Bauer torture terrorists all day. Which I know it an awful thing to say, because terrorists don't really mean to cause so much death and destruction. I mean, it's not like it's their mission in life to kill us all, so God forbid we put them through some discomfort. (note: sarcasm level is at an all-time high.)

Anyway, for a show like 24, everything depends on an outline. I'm sure the producers didn't let them start filming until they had the entire story already written down. And honestly, doing a show like 24, it's tough to do twenty-four episode that had enough action and drama in each episode and that also ended with cliffhangers. They (the writers and producers) could only do so much. They had to keep viewers tuning back in week after week, right?

Personally, I don't like the idea of outlining. It makes the process of writing more of a, well, process. You become restricted to the outline. You become to depend on it. All the novels I've written, I've never outlined. I always have a very good sense of where the story is going and where it will end up (outlining in my head, I guess), but I never put it down on paper. I like the freedom of telling the story as it happens in my head, not as it happens on the outlined page. (Of course, I haven't sold any novels, so what does that tell you?)

Last week thriller writer Lisa Gardner was quoted as saying:

[O]utline your book, scene by scene, on individual note cards. If you've written the novel, then go through it and break it down into its individual building blocks.

Apparently she "uses these cards to physically map out her book on the floor, actually visualizing the flow of the novel."

Sometimes I guess an outline is needed. I remember reading somewhere how Scott Smith extensively outlined A Simple Plan before he even started writing. Which makes sense, because that novel follows a very strict arc of events.

Harlan Coben, however, shares my viewpoint (or maybe I share his viewpoint, whichever way works for you):

I don’t outline. I usually know the ending before I start. I know very little about what happens in between. It’s like driving from New Jersey to California. I may go Route 80, I may go via the Straits of Magellan or stopover in Tokyo … but I’ll end up in California.

One of my novels was never even supposed to be a novel. I'd figured it would be a novella at the most. But as I was writing I had the protagonist and another character walking out of a building, and as they walked they passed a janitor with his head down. What that janitor was doing there, I didn't know (it was just one of those things that appeared), but a few chapters later I understood what the janitor was doing there (hint: up to no good), and it turned the story that I thought was going to be a novella into a novel of about 120,000 words.

All because of one character who, at the time, wasn't even a character.

That wouldn't have happened had I outlined the novella ahead of time. I would have felt compelled to stick to what was on the page, even if the janitor did appear.

So what does this all tell us? I hate to regurgitate the same thing, but that every writer is different. What works for one may not work for another. We just have to feel out what works best for us and go with it, despite some writers claiming that you have to do something a certain way. I always hate that: writers saying you must do something such-and-such a way.

Years ago, David Morrell told me I couldn't write a novel in the second person. He wasn't being unkind about it; he was just being matter of fact. We were having drinks in the hotel bar, him and me and Douglas Winter. He said a short story, sure you can write in the second person, but not a novel.

And you know what?

I still went ahead and wrote that novel. And my first agent shopped it around. And while there were a few nibbles, there were no bites, but that didn't discourage me. I was glad I'd written it, mostly because I was told I couldn't.

Oh, and that novel? You better believe I wrote it without an outline.

Spamming Of The Day

So I get an e-mail this morning that goes something like this:

Hi, I'm Jeff. I noticed that you're on the Kindle boards too. Just thought I'd reach out to you. I'm buying my Kindle this week (Hope it works all the way down here in Costa Rica). So, you like it better than Nook, or Sony eReader or iPad or anything else?

Below it was Jeff's picture, and the title of his novel and publisher and the price on Kindle.

Obviously I should have just deleted the e-mail, but I couldn't help myself. Here's my reply:

Hello, Jeff. I'm somewhat on the Kindle boards. In fact, I can't even remember the last time I was active on them. But thank you for your e-mail. It means a lot to know that you care ... except, you know, you didn't really address me personally. Actually, if one were to really consider it, it might appear that you went through a bunch of profiles and spammed as many people as you could, trying to make it seem like a friendly e-mail when all you are really doing is trolling for sales on your Kindle release (evidenced by the footer that contains your picture and the title of your book, plus price). Which is understandable, as self-promotion can be hard, but trust me, there are much better ways to promote yourself. Ways that -- oh, I don't know -- make you come off as less desperate.

Best luck with everything, and please take my e-mail address off your spam list.
R
I don't really expect a reply from my new buddy Jeff, but if I receive one, you bet I'll keep you updated. Have a great weekend.