No Shelter By Z. Constance Frost

If you write and publish a book and no one reads it, does it exist? It's a scary thought to consider but one that must be considered. But before I get into that, I wanted to say that tonight I finally watched The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo. I didn't care much for the book -- while I found the overall storyline really interesting, the writing was longwinded and boring -- but I really enjoyed the movie. As it's a foreign film, it was pretty explicit in parts, and I'm curious to see how much they clean it up in the American version. Everyone talks about how Lisbeth Salander is one bad ass chick, and while she certainly is, I recently read about another bad ass chick I wanted to tell you about.

Here's the description of No Shelter by Z. Constance Frost from Amazon:

Holly Lin is living two lives. To her friends and family, she's a pleasant, hardworking nanny. To her boss and colleagues, she's one of the best non-sanctioned government assassins in the world.

But when a recent mission goes wrong causing one of her team members to die, she realizes she might no longer be cut out for the work — except the mission, as it turns out, is only half over, and to complete it will take her halfway across the world and bring her face to face with a ghost from her past.

Things are about to get personal. And as Holly Lin's enemies are about to find out, she is not a nanny they want to piss off.

Not bad, right? Well what really sold me was the cover, as seen above. Apparently my friend Wyatt Perko did it. In an e-mail Z. Constance Frost told me she loved what he had done with The Silver Ring, checked out his website, and ended up contacting him about doing a cover for her book. And Wyatt, as always, came up with something really awesome. So then obviously, I told myself, I had to check out the book. I'm very glad I did.

Initially (and sheepishly) I intended on No Shelter being a "Kindle phone book." My "Kindle phone books" are the ones I read whenever I have a few spare minutes and can pull out my phone and open my Kindle app and read a chapter or two. Only sometimes I become really engrossed in the story and it takes priority over the "main book" I'm currently reading (the ones I feature on this website's sidebar). I started No Shelter last Wednesday and finished it Friday. It was fast-paced and well written with a style that reminded me of Charlie Huston with just a touch of Duane Swierczynski. Here's a part from the beginning, when the protagonist Holly Lin goes into a Las Vegas hotel for a hit:

I turn back and jump for a place just beside the door. I flick the switch for the lights just as the knob turns and the door is pushed open. I realize my heels are going to be a burden and pull them off, place the one on the floor, keep the other in my hand. I hold it with the toe pointed toward my wrist, the heel pointed out.

The door opens wider, yellow light suffusing the plush expensive carpet. The man’s silhouette holds a gun at his side.

“Jerold?” he says, caution now in his voice as he takes a step forward.

I wait for him to take another step before I lean out and swing the heel. I aim for his face but luck out and strike him in the throat. His mouth opens and his eyes go wide and his free hand goes to his neck like it will do any good, which it won’t, because I’ve driven the heel right into his larynx.

He tries raising the gun with his other hand but I grab it, turn it around so it’s aimed at his chest. I place one bullet there and push past him into the main room, see that with the four girls two men in suits have been lounging on the couches. The men are already scrambling to their feet, already reaching for their guns. I put two bullets in the one guy’s head, two bullets in the other guy’s, and then I’m running forward, the gun aimed at the guy behind the wet bar.

He ducks behind the glass, comes back up with a TEC-9, sets it on automatic and lets it rip.

I dive behind one of the couches for cover. I’m barely aware of the girls screaming and the rap music blaring and the deafening blasts of the gunfire. I eject the clip, see how many rounds I have left, pop the clip back in, rack the slide and wait a moment, a half second, before I make my move.

The guy behind the wet bar’s an idiot—he exhausts the entire clip, which gives me the chance to pop back up from behind the couch, aim and fire toward the wet bar. He sees me and ducks but I plan for that and aim low, striking him in the chest.

Two of the girls have been caught in the crossfire, their dead bodies spread out like rag dolls on the floor. The other two girls keep low with their hands on their ears, crying and screaming.

The foyer door opens and the gunfire starts up again, the guy who’d frisked me charging in with his finger pressing the trigger of his nine. I put it down to a rookie mistake—you never charge into a gunfight, not if you don’t know what’s what first—and I shoot him in the left leg twice, the guy crying out, falling, dropping his weapon.

I reach him a second later as he tries to stand back up, tries to reach for the gun. I bend down and pick his gun up, knowing he has more rounds in his piece than in mine.

His face is red. It looks like he’s hyperventilating. I should tell him to take it easy, just breathe, but instead I point his own gun at his face.

I was so impressed with this book I wondered why the author had decided to self-publish it instead of trying to go the traditional route. So I e-mailed her with this question, and after some back and forth in which I learned hardly anyone knew about the existence of this book (let alone its author), I wanted to include her answers here.

RS: As I noted, I enjoyed your book a lot. Is it really your first novel, and why did you decide to go the self-publishing route instead of going through a traditional publisher?

ZCF: Thanks again, Robert! I'm so happy you liked No Shelter. And to answer your question, no, this is not really my "first novel." I've written three other novels before this one, all which I guess would be considered "chick lit." But one day I was reading a Lee Child novel and thought it would be cool to make a female character as tough and smart as Jack Reacher. And so Holly Lin was born. It took me about six months to write it, then another six months before I managed to sign with an agent. I was thrilled but then the rejections started coming in. Basically a few editors liked it but didn't like it enough, or they liked it but didn't know how they could properly market the book. Long story short, my agent decided it was time to put the book away. And that was really disheartening, because I wrote it as the first book in a series. It wasn't like I could write the second book and try to sell that. So I decided it wouldn't hurt to self-publish it as an e-book. :-)

RS: From what you've told me, you're new to the whole social networking game, right?

ZCF: Yes, that's true. Between work and taking care of my children, I barely have enough time to write let alone try to promote myself online. But I realized that if I did self-publish this book as an e-book, I would have to make some kind of online presence. So I created a blog and got onto Facebook and that's about it. It's probably not enough but for now it's all the time I have to spare.

RS: Where does the book's title come from?

ZCF: The title is taken from a Rage Against the Machine song. If I do continue with the series (I guess it depends on how well this first book does), then I plan on titling all the books after songs. I even have the next book's title in mind, "Down in a Hole" by Alice in Chains.

RS: Final question: what does the "Z" stand for?

ZCF: Sorry, it's an old family name, and my lips are sealed. :-)

If you like fast-paced thrillers (or books with a female lead that kicks a lot of ass), I encourage you to check out No Shelter. Visit Z. Constance Frost's website for details on how you can get a free copy and a chance to win a $25 gift certificate to Amazon.

P.S. On a completely different note, Ricky Gervais is awesome!

Happy Martin Luther King Day, Horatio Caine Style

Happy Martin Luther King Day! In honor of the great man, go nail a thesis or two or three to a church door. In other news, my brother-in-law and his wife are moving out to San Francisco, where, from what I understand, everyone watches a lot of Full House and eats a lot of Rice-A-Roni. On Saturday night my wife and I went to their going away party. It was fun. It was also where, at some point and for some reason, a conversation started about David Caruso, and which is why I wanted to share the great montage found below. That is all. Tune in tomorrow for something completely different.

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_sarYH0z948

Binocular Vision

Why in the world had I never heard of Edith Pearlman? And why, if you hadn’t, hadn’t you? It certainly isn’t the fault of her writing, which is intelligent, perceptive, funny and quite beautiful, as demonstrated in “Binocular Vision: New and Selected Stories.” In the world of literary fiction Pearlman is hardly unknown: she’s the author of three previous collections, “Vaquita,” “Love Among the Greats” and “How to Fall”; she has won several prizes; and her work has appeared repeatedly in “Best American Short Stories.” So she should be known all over the place.

The above is from Roxana Robinson's review in today's New York Times of Edith Pearlman's new collection Binocular Vision. It's a sentiment heard from many experiencing Pearlman's work for the first time. I had the pleasure of working with Edith on the Hint Fiction anthology with her marvelous story "Golden Years," which I also ended up reading on Weekend Edition Saturday with Scott Simon (Edith has told me people still compliment her on that story having heard it on NPR).

Of her new collection, T.C. Boyle says "Edith Pearlman is an absolute master of the form: these stories that abjure tricks and flash for brilliantly drawn characters, classic construction, and language that sings and aches all at once." Anthony Doerr says "If you read, write, or teach short fiction -- if you believe gorgeous, scrupulously made literature nourishes the soul -- then you must read Edith Pearlman." And in the collection's introduction, Ann Patchett says:

When I was asked to write this introduction, an invitation I leapt at, I sat down to read the manuscript with a pen in my hand. I thought it would be a good idea to underline some of the best sentences so I could quote them along the way, but I could quickly see the ridiculousness of that idea. I was underlining the entire book. Okay, I thought, just put a check by your favorite stories so you can be sure to mention them, but by the time I'd finished reading the book, every one of them was checked. Every story.

I could mention so many more reviews of this collection -- like David L. Ulin's review in The Los Angeles Times or the fact that Publishers Weekly gave it a starred review -- but instead I'll simply tell you that Binocular Vision is published by Lookout Books and that Edith Pearlman will be at AWP. If you plan to be at the conference too, do yourself a favor and seek her out.

Parasites

Here's an interesting response to yesterday's post:

Am I wrong in calling some of these hints “parasites”? I kind of resent the pieces that couldn’t exist without someone else’s work. Without the Gorgon myth, “Before Perseus” is meaningless, but okay, a myth has no author. The worst is the Mamatas piece which creates nothing on its own, but trades entirely on Beckett’s play. He’s got no story of his own, just Beckett’s, which he trivializes.

I never heard of the term "parasites" before but I guess it makes sense, in a way. Not that I agree that the stories in the collection are in fact parasites. They, like all good literary re-imaginings, bring something new and unique to the table. Yes, Nick Mamatas's piece relies solely on Samuel Beckett's Waiting for Godot, but so what? Yes, some fun is had in the piece at Beckett's expense, but I don't think it trivializes the play. If anything, I think Beckett would have gotten a good chuckle out of the story if he were alive today and read it. Either that or become insanely angry and order a fatwa on the author's head.

Still, the term "parasites" got me thinking about other books that rely on famous literary classics. Like Grendal by John Gardner, or March by Geraldine Brooks, or Cold Mountain by Charles Frazier, or, most recently, The Story of Edgar Sawtelle by David Wroblewski. The list goes on and on. Are they, to an extent, being parasitic? Each, I believe, brings something new and unique to the table. Each uses a famous literary work as a starting off point and builds from there.

But what about other books that exist merely to capitalize on literary classics?

The most recent is the unauthorized Catcher in the Rye sequel which has once again found its way back into the spotlight. The author's intent, in my opinion at least, was to simply make some money off an already famous classic (though, let's be honest here, fewer and fewer people are reading Catcher in the Rye anymore). It's like someone writing a sequel to To Kill a Mockingbird, telling the story of Scout forty years later, where she, no doubt, lives in an top-floor apartment in a big city with two dozen cats and shoots at mockingbirds with a BB gun for sport.

Of course, the most parasitic trend going on right now are the zombie mashups. Look, while I have no desire to read Pride and Prejudice and Zombies, I have to hand it to Seth Grahame-Smith and the people at Quirk Books for coming up with a brillant concept. But it should have just been left at that. Except no, we have to beat a dead horse (or zombie horse) because why the hell not? That's why now it seems nearly every public domain novel is fodder for a zombie retelling. The worst of the bunch are those that don't even understand the concept of a mashup. The idea here is to take two completely different genres and put them together, but now you have books in the same genre mashed up (one in particular was released in bookstores not so long ago). It's like the author thought, Hmm, this is already a horror story, but maybe if I added zombies, it would make it even more horrorer (sic).

No, numbskull, it makes it boring and unoriginal and makes you nothing more than a hack.

P.S. With all this hoopla over the "cleansed" version of Huckleberry Finn, someone should write a novel from Jim's point of view, maybe his life years later, and call it N-word Jim ... but, you know, actually use the real word. Now that title there, that will sell books. Anybody want to take the ball and run with it, go right ahead. Just make sure you mention me in the acknowledgements.

Topic Questions

I'll post about this again later in the month, but anyone going to AWP? If so, be sure to stop by Virginia B Room of the Marriott Wardman Park at 3:00 on Friday for what is probably going to be the greatest panel ever:

Hint Fiction: Stories that Prove Less is More. (Robert Swartwood, Randall Brown, Michael Martone, Daniel Olivas, Roxane Gay) The editor of the recent Norton anthology and its contributors examine stories of extreme brevity. They will discuss whether these stories are considered actual stories, and whether they hold substance, focusing on these questions: Do works of this length help or hinder writers? Can these tiny stories have just as much impact as stories of traditional length? The panelists will share their own hint fiction and discuss its role in the ongoing evolution of literature.

Well, okay, I am a tad biased, but I'm sure it's going to be a fun time. I'm actually in the process of organizing a list of topic questions and was wondering for those who are not going to be in attendance, is there anything you'd like to ask in regards to Hint Fiction or just extremely short stories in general, something that myself or Randall Brown or Michael Martone or Daniel Olivas or Roxane Gay could perhaps answer?

Wait, you're probably thinking, why would I want to ask a question to an answer I'll never hear because I won't be at the conference?

Good question. The reason, my friend, is if all goes well, I'll try to have the panel recorded and upload online for your perusal. Sound good?

Yes, you're probably thinking, it does.

Glad to hear it. So then if you do have any questions, let me know in the comments section. Thanks.