Hint Fiction

How I Spent My Summer Vacation

I'd promised a recap of the anthology reading period, and here it is. Sorry for the delay, but the truth is it seems that for the past six months all I've been talking about is Hint Fiction, and it's starting to bore even me. And while most of the work is done, there is still much to do, like organizing the 125 stories in some kind of coherent order (I'd like some of them to play off each other if possible), so yes, I have been dragging my feet. First, some eagle eyed readers noticed that Augusto Monterroso's name was not included in the list of contributors. Yes, I did finally get in touch with his estate, and after much back and forth it looked like I would be able to include his story. The estate wanted a good chunk of change from me, and while it was a hefty sum this whole project has never been about money but about putting together a great collection, and despite the fact I've never actually been a fan of the story (I consider myself somewhat bright, but I've never actually "understood" what the story was about, not like the Hemingway piece), "The Dinosaur" is considered one of the shortest stories ever and I felt I should include it. But at one point the estate started asking certain questions about print runs and whatnot, and I asked if I was paying this hefty sum for just one edition of the anthology or all editions -- meaning, if the anthology were to go through five printings, would I be shelling out that good chunk of change for every printing (something my editor advised me not to do). It was at that point, strangely enough, the estate never got back to me, so that was that. Oh well.

Also, one of the contributors whose story I accepted never got back to me. After several attempts at communication, I finally sent an e-mail stating that if they didn't get back to me within a few days, I would have to pass on their story. Which meant I would be short one story. Worst case scenario I could use one of mine, though I really don't like when editors publish their own work (though it makes sense for big name authors, like when Michael Connelly edits an anthology, sure he's going to include a story of his own; it's probably written out in the contract that way because a story by him will help to move copies, as opposed to some small fry like myself). But then, in an amazing occurrence of serendipity, I received an e-mail the next day from a writer who I had solicited months back, who had expressed interest in submitting but never got back to me. This particular writer apologized for the delay and said he figured he was much too late but had a story for me to see anyway, and I wrote back saying yes, in a way it was much too late but in a way it wasn't, and explained about the reticent contributor, and ... well, long story short, the original writer never got back to me so I'm quite happy to say that Ron Carlson has been added to the contributor roster.

Another thing to mention -- I'd said before that there were four authors who had two stories each in the anthology. That number is actually five. I don't know how I missed that before, but as you can imagine I've been kind of overwhelmed.

Anyway, thinking about all the stories I've read, I went back to the old blog to the post that I did after the initial contest, about the kind of stories that Gay and I read. Surprise, surprise -- it was the same this time around as it was then:

We received a good number of entries that were quite well done. Beautiful language, almost poetic in their execution.

But they weren’t stories.

Some were very good stories, but they somehow managed to be self-sustained. Which, to be honest, is no small feat. It’s quite impressive, but it’s not Hint Fiction.

Hint Fiction is not objective. If you write a 100-word story, that’s a drabble. A 50-word story, that’s a dribble. But if you were to write 25-word or less story, that doesn’t necessarily make it Hint Fiction.

The keyword in all of this is “hint” — you need to ask yourself, what are you hinting at? What is the bigger picture?

The thesis of the anthology, I’ve decided, is to prove that a story 25 word or less can have just as much impact as a story 2,500 words or longer.

That, of course, will all depend on the individual reader.

One interesting point to bring up is that there were some contest entries I loved at first. Gay loved certain entries at first too. But we may not have loved the same ones, and we talked about them, saying what worked for us and what didn’t. Nine times out of ten, we were able to see the other person’s point of view.

Or there were some stories that, on the initial read, were fantastic. But the more we read them, the more we began to see problems. Remember, one of the biggest challenges here is word choice. The idea of the story may have been brilliant, but the writer either rushed it or didn’t fully understand what she or he was doing and, because of that, took a misstep that ultimately hurt the story.

A lot of what else I saw this time around were stories that read more like first sentences, or stories that read like a random sentence or two plucked from an unpublished short story and attempted to be passed off as Hint Fiction. Something like:

That morning my grandfather gave me the keys to his old Fold pickup truck.

Um, okay. (Note that this example and the ones that follow are my own taken from the top of my head; none are taken from the stories submitted.)

There were also "stories" that were not stories at all but more like lines out of a fortune cookie. Or a movie pitch. Or a story synopsis. Like:

THE BOOGEYMAN

The monster is hiding under Jimmy's bed. Will Jimmy survive the night?

Or:

THE BOOGEYMAN

Jimmy knows he's under the bed. Watch out, Jimmy, here he comes!

And before anyone asks, no, I am not exaggerating. I received a very large portions of stories just like that. On the flip side, I received a good number of stories that were very well done. Nothing necessarily wrong with them; they just didn't win me over. Ask an editor at any magazine: they'll come across stories that are well-written, well-done, but that just aren't right for them. That's how it was in this case.

You see, nothing like this has ever been done before. What this anthology is ultimately going to do is define what Hint Fiction is and what it can be. And as I read through the 2,000+ stories, I realized this important basic truth:

Hint Fiction is not a complete story (a beginning, middle, end) but it is complete, in which it can stand by itself.

Look at Hemingway's story. It stands perfectly by itself. It doesn't read like the first sentence of a story, or even a random sentence plucked from a story. It's complete without actually being complete.

So with that in mind:

THE BOOGEYMAN

Jimmy could never decide which monster was worse -- the one under his bed or the one he called Daddy.

A little more complete, sure, but ultimately it's also trite. Which is another hurdle writers face when writing Hint Fiction. With so few words, writers tend to depend on cliches without even knowing it.

In a perfect world, this anthology will be wildly successful and after a couple years there will be a chance to do another anthology. And if that's the case, I suspect the quality of submissions will increase one hundred fold (keeping in mind that there will also be the usual crappy slush). Will that happen? Time will tell, I guess, but I'm not holding my breath.

Finally, months back I asked what makes a professional writer. After having sent out all rejections, I saw a wide range of professionalism and unprofessionalism. The most notable was a writer/editor who basically said that I was wrong and his stories were in fact right for the anthology. (Classy for sure.) Then there was another writer who wrote back asking what "anthology" she was being rejected from, as she did not remember ever submitting to it in the first place. (Take the extra minute and do a quick search through your own e-mail before making an ass out of yourself.) And then there were a handful of writers who wrote back thanking me for my time but then saying something along the lines that it wasn't a big deal that their stories weren't picked as they didn't spend too much time on them anyway. (Really? Is that supposed to hurt my feelings or something? If anything, you're making yourself look like an idiot for admitting you didn't really work on your stories, so yeah, of course your stories didn't make the cut.) And then finally there were the writers who responded with a nice note saying thanks for reading, which was completely unnecessary but appreciated nonetheless.

So there you have it. I can't think of anything else to add, though I have been fighting the flu all weekend and still not 100% so I'm sure I might be missing something. Until next time ...

In Which I Announce The Contributors

All responses have gone out. I'd promised mid-October and mid-October I delivered ... so to speak. Again, I apologize for having to spread it out over the course of a few days. I wish there was a magic button somewhere I could have pressed and sent everyone a response at the same time, but alas, that button does not exist (as far as I know). Plus, if you send out too many e-mails in a short amount of time using Gmail, Google thinks you're a spammer and suspends your account for an hour or two, so that didn't help matters either. Anyway, I'd said this anthology would include between 100 and 150 stories. The magic number falls right between that: 125. Could I have added more stories? Probably. But for me this was a matter of quality over quantity (not that there weren't a lot of good stories, because there were, but, well, I will explain more about the entire process and my thoughts in the next blog post).

So 125 stories out of more than 2,500 stories submitted (counting both the initial contest and this open reading period). That's a lot of stories, even if they are 25 words or less.

Note too that four writers have two stories each -- which is fascinating, as the stories were read blind. Also, what's very cool is that this anthology marks the first sale for a handful of writers.

A few of the writers whose stories I've accepted have yet to get back to me, so I haven't included their names, but here are the writers whose work will appear in Hint Fiction: An Anthology of Stories in 25 Words or Less (still working title) that is tentatively scheduled to be published by Norton in the fall of 2010:

Jenn Alandy, Nick Arvin, Samuel Baldwin, Max Barry, Kirsten Beachy, L.R. Bonehill, Ryan W. Bradley, Gary A. Braunbeck, William Brazill, Yvonne Brockwell, Jeremy D. Brooks, Randall Brown, Ken Bruen, Stace Budzko, James Burt, Frank Byrns, Jonathan Carroll, John Cashman, Adam-Troy Castro, Douglas Clegg, Danielle Combs, Chris Compson, John Connors, Hannah Craig, Brian Crawford, Blake Crouch, Kirk Curnutt, Tara Deal, Gay Degani, Stephen Dunn, Nicole Duson, Stuart Dybek, David Erlewine, Camille Esses, Merrilee Faber, Nada Faris, Jamie Felton, James Frey, Janet E. Gardner, Roxane Gay, Shanna Germain, Tess Gerritsen, Bill Graffius, Charles Gramlich,Val Gryphin, Jane Hammons, Ann Harleman, Bruce Harris, Donora Hillard, Rachel Lopez Hohenshell, Robin Hollis, Kevin Hosey, Eric Hsu, Gregg Hurwitz, Ben Jahn, Ha Jin, Jason Jordan, David Joseph, Michael Kelly, Jack Ketchum, Jack Kilborn, J.A. Konrath, Christina Kopp, Minter Krotzer, Joe Lansdale, Don Lee, Min Jin Lee, Sarah Lyons, K. J. Maas, Nick Mamatas, Lewis Manalo, Marshall Ryan Maresca, Michael Martone, Natalie McNabb, David Miller, Sarah P. Miller, Ty Miller, John Minichillo, Gwendolyn Joyce Mintz, Christoffer Molnar, Madeline Mora-Summonte, Rose Rappoport Moss, Barry Napier,  Joyce Carol Oates, Brendan O’Brien, Daniel A. Olivas, Will Panzo, Edith Pearlman, Benjamin Percy, Sophie Playle, Jason Rice, Katrina Robinson, Jess Row, Robin Rozanski, Kathleen A. Ryan, Marcus Sakey, Joe Schreiber, Jessa Slade, Noel Sloboda, Andrea Slye, Jenn Sober, Kelly Spitzer, Agnieszka Stachura, J. J. Steinfeld, Peter Straub, Jake Thomas, Bob Thurber, Jade Walker, Ben White, Amber Whitley, Sue Williams, F. Paul Wilson, Robley Wilson, Mercedes M. Yardley, Mabel Yu, J. Matthew Zoss

Thanks again to everyone who submitted. There was a lot of great work, and as always this publishing game is subjective. Also, I'm behind on e-mails, so if you e-mailed me in the past couple days and haven't heard back, I'm not ignoring you and will respond as soon as I can. Until then, I'm off to rest my weary head.

It Is Done. Sort Of.

Last night I started sending out responses for the anthology. All acceptances have been sent out -- that was the first order of business -- and a good chunk of rejections, but there's another good chunk (well, okay, massive chunk) of people that still need to be notified. For some reason I thought I could do it all in one night, I really did. I know, I know -- what a clueless idiot.

But I know how quickly news spreads on this neato little thing we called the Interweb, and word will get around that some people have been accepted or rejected, and then some people -- that massive chunk -- will wonder, Hey, what about me?

Don't worry, nobody's forgetting about you. Unfortunately, if you haven't heard anything yet, it means a rejection is coming your way. Again, I wish I didn't have to let some of you know this way, but I've been staring at the computer screen now for six hours, it's about four a.m. right now, and I have to get up in five hours. I just. Can't. Do. It.

By tomorrow night I hope to respond to everyone else -- some seven hundred people -- and I hope to put up a list of the stories and authors who will appear in the anthology. It won't be an official table of contents, as that will be the next order of business (putting all those stories in some coherent order), but at least it will be something. Then, at some later point, I will post something about my experience, stuff I saw that I liked and didn't like, common trends, etc.

What's the main thing I took away from this?

If it ever happens again, I'm investing in a submission manager, that's what.

Now I must step away. Hopefully I can make it to my bed without falling over and knocking my head open. I really, really do. G'night.

A Quick Hint Update

I'd made mention of this on Twitter a few days back, but I realize not everyone is on Twitter, and if they are, they aren't necessarily following me, so here's the skinny: The maybe pile has been weaned down even more. Out of the initial 276 stories, I have pulled out 45 "definites" and put 111 in what I'm calling the "maybe-maybe" pile.

Now it's just a matter of picking and choosing about half of those 111 stories, which I must say is going to be very hard, as they're all so great.

So ... that's it for now. In the next day or so I plan to have another mini-contest in celebration of a story being published in a magazine that was thought to be dead. Stay tuned.

Anthology Update & What Is A Professional Writer?

Thanks all for leaving comments and e-mailing me about Augusto Monterroso's estate. I'm happy to say I've gotten in contact with them and it's looking like there's a very good chance I'll be able to include his story in the anthology. Tuesday night I did a read-through of the stories in the maybe pile. Out of the 276 stories, I check marked 149. What does this mean exactly? Well, those 149 stories were what stuck out to me at that moment. Because these stories are so short and rely so much on my participation as a reader (i.e., a lot of imagination), my mood at the time (even the weather) can sway my opinion on any particular story. So I'm setting those stories aside and next week will read through the 276 stories again. I know the suspense is killing some of you, and I apologize for that, but I hope you understand the amount of time and thought I need to put into these stories. If this were a magazine with multiple issues, I probably could have made my decisions by now and sent out responses. But obviously in terms of this anthology -- most likely a once and done thing -- I have to be extremely selective.

Finally, I am curious to know what you think makes a professional writer. A couple posts back in the comments section there had been a mention of novice and professional writers, and I had said for argument sake let's assume a professional writer is someone who makes their living completely off their writing, with no other source of income. Daniel Olivas then mentioned how he didn't quite agree with that statement, saying he doesn't think many "professional" writers write full-time.

He's right, of course. As Joe Konrath once put it, more people play in the NFL than there are people who write full-time.

No two writers are alike. Michael Connelly published four novels before he quit working as a crime reporter and went to write full-time. T.C. Boyle regularly publishes stories in The New Yorker and Playboy and has a book coming out almost every year, many bestsellers, but still he teaches writing at the University of Southern California where he's been since 1978. My buddy Joe Schreiber, who has two novels coming out next month (one a Star Wars novel, another an original horror novel), works full-time as an MRI tech. He's married, has kids, but still manages to find time to write. When I asked him once if he ever thought he'd get to a point where he could write full-time, he said he'd be happy to get to a point where he could cut back to part-time work and spend the rest writing.

Again, no two writers are alike, but despite all those differences, I consider all three of those gentlemen professional writers.

There is no definitive answer on this topic. Just like everyone has their own definition of what lazy means, everyone has their own definition of what professional means. I will say that I think many people base whether or not someone is a "professional" in terms of success. If a writer has a bestseller or wins a lot of awards, they can easily be considered a professional writer (even if that writer still has a day job). Then there are other writers who aren't very well known, who have never won an award, yet they somehow manage to make enough money to stay afloat writing full-time. Would they, then, be considered a professional writer?

This is why I'm curious to see what other people think. And this doesn't even have to apply to writers. Like, what makes a professional musician? Somebody who's signed by a major record label and whose songs are played nonstop on the radio? They make their living off their art, sure, but so do some people in cover bands that play local bars. Not a lot of people, but a few, and if both types make their living off their music ... well, I'm sure you see just how slippery this slope really is.

It's also worth noting that there are "professional writers" who are arrogant assholes that act very unprofessional most of the time. Yet they continue to be successful in the amount of books they sell, the awards they win, etc.

And then you have the novice writer who has been trying to sell a novel for years and hasn't managed it yet, and despite how frustrating it is, how it looks like it will never happen, they manage to maintain a level of professionalism in every aspect of their writing.

I could keep throwing out examples but I think I'll open it up to you. Again, there's no right or wrong answer, but still I'm curious to see what you have to say.